Blogs in Real Estate

A common question about reverse home mortgages is if they are truly more useful than a second mortgage. 

Some seniors who are intimidated by having to understand reverse mortgages wonder whether it would be simpler to get a home equity loan or a new mortgage that allows them to take some equity out of their home. The problem with this approach is that you now you have to begin paying traditional mortgage loans back soon after taking them out, thereby cutting into your monthly cash flow & savings.

Suppose that you own a home worth $250,000 with no mortgage debt. You decide to take out a $100,000, 15-year mortgage at 8 percent interest. Although you will receive $100,000, you’ll have to begin making monthly payments of $956. No problem you may think; I’ll just invest my $100,000 and come out ahead. Wrong!

Most seniors lend toward safe bonds, which may yield in the neighborhood of 5 to 6 percent - yielding about $416 to $500 of monthly income - far short of the amount you would need to cover your monthly mortgage payments. You could invest in stocks and earn the market average return of 10 percent per year, which is by not guaranteed, your returns would amount to more - $833 per month - but still not enough to cover your monthly mortgage payment. (Also note that most income from stocks and bonds is taxable at both the federal and state level. By contrast, reverse mortgage payments you receive are not taxable, yes, tax free)

Also, another downside of taking out a traditional mortgage to supplement your retirement income. The longer you live in the house, the more likely you are to run out of money and begin the possibility of missing loan payments because you drain your principal (savings) to supplement inadequate investment returns and cover your monthly loan mortgage payment. If that happens, unlike with a reverse mortgage, you may be faced with foreclosure on your loan, and you can lose your house.